Glossary of the World Trade Organisation and public health: part 1

Ronald Labonte, Globalization and Health Equity, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Matthew Sanger, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006

“…..The relation between health and trade is not new. Disease and pestilence have long followed global trade routes, a pattern that continues into the 21st century. A Chinese trade ship was the source of Latin America’s cholera outbreak in 1991, which resulted in 10 000 deaths.1 Increased trade in tobacco products and processed foods high in sugar or fat contribute to rising chronic disease rates in poorer countries.2,3

Trade can also be good for health, improving peoples’ lives through access to goods or technologies that cure disease or improve wellbeing. Proponents of trade liberalisation argue further that it can increase economic growth and wealth creation, both of which may reduce poverty4 and allow for greater investments in health care, education, environmental protection, and other population health determinants.5 Others maintain that the relation is subtler. Development economist, Ha-Joon Chang6 points out that today’s wealthy countries became so through a variety of policies-infant industry protection, export subsidisation, copying of foreign technologies, and strong state controls over foreign investment-that new trade liberalisation rules increasingly deny poorer countries.

Many of these trade rules came into existence with the creation of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995. The WTO’s influence extends beyond commercial relations to affect health, social welfare, and culture. This two part glossary introduces the WTO trade treaties (the generic term for specific trade agreements) and explains the key principles and concepts of interest to policy makers and practitioners. It aims to explain the WTO through a public health lens that focuses on disease control and prevention, the reduction of a wide range of health risks, and a commitment to reducing health inequities. The public health implications of these agreements can be direct, as in the restrictions the Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights* (TRIPS) can place on access to essential medicines. They can also be indirect in two important ways:

1.       the degree to which WTO agreements skew economic benefits and the health advantages these bring in favour of already wealthier/healthier nations and population groups; and

2.       WTO expansion into trade related areas that have little to do with reducing border-barriers to imported goods, and that could restrict national governments’ abilities to regulate in the interests of public health.

Part 1 of this glossary introduces the WTO and its origins as an institution, and summarises the WTO rules on trade in goods that are most relevant to public health.

Part 2 considers rules specific to trade in services, intellectual property, investment, and government procurement.

Richard D Smith

Trade and public health: facing the challenges of globalisation

J. Epidemiol. Community Health, August 1, 2006; 60(8): 650 – 651. [[PDF]

*      *      *     *

This message from the Pan American Health Organization, PAHO/WHO, is part of an effort to disseminate

information Related to: Equity; Health inequality; Socioeconomic inequality in health; Socioeconomic

health differentials; Gender; Violence; Poverty; Health Economics; Health Legislation; Ethnicity; Ethics;

Information Technology – Virtual libraries; Research & Science issues.  [DD/ IKM Area]

“Materials provided in this electronic list are provided “as is”. Unless expressly stated otherwise, the findings

and interpretations included in the Materials are those of the authors and not necessarily of The Pan American

Health Organization PAHO/WHO or its country members”.